Tech earnings pull equities higher; have retail investors taken over the market?

Tech earnings pull equities higher; have retail investors taken over the market?

Equities 8 minutes to read
Picture of Peter Garnry
Peter Garnry

Chief Investment Strategist

Summary:  Better than expected earnings from Facebook, Tesla and Microsoft lifted equities to new local highs. The market seems for now to don't care about no company is offering any guidance and that Q2 is one big unknown. We also focus in this equity update on the increasing index weight concentration in S&P 500 and the evidence of retail investor bonanza driving sentiment in equities.


NASDAQ 100 futures were up 3.6% yesterday as technology earnings for Q1 continued to surprise positively. Sentiment is equities is strong and the NASDAQ 100 is now up 3.5% for the year despite the deepest recession since the 1930s is ahead of markets. On last night’s FOMC meeting and subsequent press conference Fed Chair Powell said that a V-shape recovery was very unlikely as society could go back and forth between opening up and locking down until a vaccine was found. Equities nevertheless powered on sending some technology stocks close to all-time highs.

While we understood the initial bounce back in late March from what was clearly an oversold environment due to margin calls we have been sceptical for weeks of the rally. But we have to accept the price momentum for now by the market and cannot rule out higher levels in equities until momentum has exhausted itself. We believe a big part of the price formation is driven by a retail investor bonanza which we will explain later on while institutional investors are more in a passive waiting position. With the end of April some larger institutional funds may consider rebalancing portfolios as the equity weights in portfolios have clearly gone up, so selling pressure from this investor group could arise in early May.

30_PG_2
Source: Saxo Group

Also adding to sentiment in equities was a statement from Gilead Sciences that came back with an official statement on their drug Remdesivir for treating COVID-19 since the big debacle last week with Chinese studies at odds with US studies. Gilead’s press release on its phase 3 trial suggest faster recovery for patients compared to the control group. The FDA is considered an emergency approval for the drug already by Wednesday next week.

Earnings that moved the market

Facebook delivered a positive revenue surprise and EPS that was in line but what the market reacted to was the comment on the earnings call that the April advertising revenue had stabilised (see quote below). But it’s important to note that Facebook sees massive uncertainty and that since stabilisation could easily turn negative again as companies review their spending plans as the economy opens up.

“We experienced a significant reduction in the demand for advertising, as well as a related decline in the pricing of our ads, over the last three weeks of the first quarter of 2020. Due to the increasing uncertainty in our business outlook, we are not providing specific revenue guidance for the second quarter or full-year 2020, but rather a snapshot on revenue performance in the second quarter thus far. After the initial steep decrease in advertising revenue in March, we have seen signs of stability reflected in the first three weeks of April, where advertising revenue has been approximately flat compared to the same period a year ago, down from the 17% year-over-year growth in the first quarter of 2020. The April trends reflect weakness across all of our user geographies as most of our major countries have had some sort of shelter-in-place guidelines in effect. (Source: Facebook press release)

Tesla beat revenue estimates for Q1 while also delivering a surprise net profit but the latter was more of technical character as the EV maker delivered a free cash flow loss of $900mn compared to a gain of around $1bn in the previous quarter. The company did not spend any time on COVID-19 and how it has impacted the business which was unusual. Instead the company boasted its investments in factories, self-driving technology and that it what sure it would deliver industry leading operating margins. The CEO and co-founder Elon Musk also spent time on the earnings call to call the US government ‘fascist’ and ‘undemocratic’ for closing his Fremont car factory hinting that the impact may be significant for Q2.

Microsoft is arguably one of the best monopolies since Standard Oil and managed to deliver once again beating estimates on top and bottom line and improved its operating margins. Microsoft said there was minimal net impact on the business from COVID-19 but did raise that it could impact the business going forward. For now many new work-from-home setups and faster transition to cloud for many businesses helped the core OS and productivity business while the cloud business Azure grew revenue 59% y/y.

No guidance leaves the market guessing

Symptomatic for all earnings releases has been the skipping of any Q2 guidance and beyond. This means that investors are essentially flying as also companies have zero visibility as how the economic impact translate into business from here on. With the absence of information from companies we continue to argue that the best guess for future profitability remains the dividend futures market which for now is still only slowing improving trailing the excitement in equity markets.
30_PG_3
Source: Bloomberg

Amazon and Apple

The next two technology and e-commerce giants are expected to be released after the close tonight with consensus expecting Apple to see revenue down 7% y/y and EPS down 9% y/y with products expected to be weak while their services segment is expected to have performed strongly. Consensus is looking for Amazon to see revenue up 24% y/y in Q1 and EPS up 28% y/y as the e-commerce and cloud computing giant benefitted from work-from-home policies and lockdowns. This is the last chance for bears to get their catalyst on the downside. If earnings from Apple and Amazon are strong sentiment could be bolstered even more.

Market concentration and retail investor bonanza

As we have been arguing for weeks it’s difficult to understand the behaviour in equities from a fundamentals viewpoint but we respect the market action. What we believe best explains the disregard of fundamentals is evidence that suggests that retail investors are entering the market at an unprecedented speed.

Charles Schwab has got 609,000 new client accounts in Q1 with half of those in March alone and record trading activity driven by zero commission on cash equity and ETF instruments in the US. It’s the same trend we observe among other US brokerages firms for retail investors and many retail investors were behind the catastrophic event around the USO ETF tracking front month WTI oil futures. Google Trend data suggest that the interest for equities have risen as casinos and sport betting have grinded to a halt due to the lockdown underscoring our view that the current market environment in equities is dominated by a bonanza of retail investors. But more problematic these investors typically don’t look at fundamentals but only look at charts and trades in names they can recognise which are often technology stocks.

30_PG_1
Source: Bloomberg and Saxo Group

Another worrying sign is the fact that the 10 largest stocks in the S&P 500 now account for 25.4% of the index the highest level since the absolute peak during the dot-com bubble. This means that the market pricing is driven by fewer and fewer stocks increasing the risk in the system. It basically means that the entropy is falling which is often not sustainable for long.

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Upending the global order at blinding speed

    Quarterly Outlook

    Upending the global order at blinding speed

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
  • Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Quarterly Outlook

    Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Quarterly Outlook

    China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Quarterly Outlook

    Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Althea Spinozzi

    Head of Fixed Income Strategy

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900
Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

Select region

International
International

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.