What does German stimulus and US-China tensions mean for Adidas?

What does German stimulus and US-China tensions mean for Adidas?

Equities 5 minutes to read
Picture of Peter Garnry
Peter Garnry

Chief Investment Strategist

Summary:  Adidas has done much better than Nike in the past five years in terms of growing its operating profit taking market share in North America and gaining traction in China. The company announced this morning that its Q2 China sales is above the same period last year indicating that Chinese consumers are favouring Adidas over Nike in what could have a link to the ongoing US-China tensions. Germany's government also announced last night a VAT reduction from 19% to 16% starting on 1 July which will also help Adidas going forward.


Adidas shares are up 1% today outperforming the market due to two events. A German coalition agreed late last night to a new €130bn stimulus package which includes a VAT reduction from 19% to 16% starting 1 July. This will add tailwind for the it German business but even more importantly the German decision could lead to more VAT reductions in other EU countries. However, the most important event was Adidas’ announcement this morning that it’s Q2 sales in China so far is higher than the same period last year surprising the market. This shows the rebound among Chinese consumers but more importantly that Adidas might be favoured by Chinese consumers over Nike products due to US-China tensions.

We mentioned Adidas already back in early March as the stock was part of our ‘bounce back basket’. The stock has lagged behind Nike in the rebound with Nike shares reaching an all-time high yesterday erasing the losses in February and March. Adidas shares have 26% to go before they reach an all-time high. This shows the speculative fever in US equities as we have highlighted over and over again as today’s Chinese numbers show Adidas has a lead over Nike in the world fastest growing and most important consumer market. Shareholders in Adidas can still be content with the fact that Adidas shares have delivered total return of 352% since 1 January 2015 while Nike shares have only delivered 121%.

4_PG_1

Adidas had two years of strategic changes in 2014-2015 which then put the company on an aggressive profit trend with EBITDA growing much faster than Nike that got into trouble in its North America market where Adidas began to do better. The recent decline in Adidas EBITDA is because their Q1 ends in March and thus got a larger impact across all geographies than Nike which latest fiscal quarter ended in February and thus only got impacted on its Greater China business.

The key catalysts for Adidas are EBITDA margin improvement although Adidas finally caught up with Nike on operating margins in 2019; the potential is more limited now but direct online sales to consumers is a path to higher margins. On revenue Adidas seems to be enjoying higher growth than Nike and the US-China tensions could add to this spread driven by the China business. For shareholders in Adidas it should also be a comfort that the stock is valued at a 5% forward free cash flow yield compared to Nike’s 2.8% free cash flow yield.

4_PG_2

The key risks to consumer stocks such as Adidas and Nike are changing supply chains disruption and increasing costs of product. Prolonged economic recession is also a key risk as economic growth drives consumer spending. Finally valuations on equities are getting elevated and thus investors should be careful not to overpay for future growth.

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Quarterly Outlook

    China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Quarterly Outlook

    Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Althea Spinozzi

    Head of Fixed Income Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: Will lower rates lift all boats in equities?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: Will lower rates lift all boats in equities?

    Peter Garnry

    Chief Investment Strategist

    After a period of historically high equity index concentration driven by the 'Magnificent Seven' sto...
  • Commodity Outlook: Gold and silver continue to shine bright

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Gold and silver continue to shine bright

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Macro Outlook: The US rate cut cycle has begun

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro Outlook: The US rate cut cycle has begun

    Peter Garnry

    Chief Investment Strategist

    The Fed started the US rate cut cycle in Q3 and in this macro outlook we will explore how the rate c...
  • FX Outlook: USD in limbo amid political and policy jitters

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX Outlook: USD in limbo amid political and policy jitters

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

    As we enter the final quarter of 2024, currency markets are set for heightened turbulence due to US ...

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900
Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

Select region

International
International

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.