Fed’s Jumbo Rate Cut: Short-Term Goldilocks, Long-Term Volatility

Below are some key takeaways from the FOMC announcement and what it can mean for your portfolios

Economics Uncertainty Drives Policy Uncertainty

Fed Chair Jerome Powell used the press conference to emphasize that the Fed is not on a pre-set path and warned against assuming that the current pace of rate cuts will continue. He reiterated that decisions will be made on a meeting-by-meeting basis, allowing the Fed to move quicker, slower, or even pause if necessary. Importantly, Powell remained optimistic about the economy, despite signs of a loosening labor market, making it clear that the larger rate cut comes from a position of strength, not weakness.

Mixed economic signals have made policymaking more challenging, as the Fed balances competing forces. The decision to cut rates despite Q3 GDP growth still looking strong underscores rising economic uncertainty and reinforces the "two-lane economy" narrative. Some sectors remain resilient, while others are struggling under the weight of high interest rates.

This ambiguity was also reflected in the FOMC's split vote, with Governor Michelle Bowman dissenting in favor of a smaller 25bps cut. Bowman's dissent marks the first by a Fed Governor since 2005, highlighting the complexities of post-pandemic policymaking and the increasing likelihood of a more fractured Fed committee in the future.

Soft Landing Focus is a Goldilocks for Risk Assets

The Fed’s jumbo rate cut clearly signals its intention to support the U.S. economy and guide it towards a soft landing, where inflation is brought under control without triggering a recession. Powell reiterated that rate cuts are not a sign of economic weakness but rather a carefully calibrated approach to maintain growth while managing inflationary pressures.

This balancing act is a Goldilocks scenario for risk assets—rate cuts provide support for growth, while the absence of a severe recession keeps risk appetite alive. For investors, this means the current environment could remain favorable for equities and other risk-on assets, as the Fed continues to walk the fine line between supporting the economy and managing inflation.

Lack of Forward Guidance Will Mean Market Volatility

The Fed’s focus on achieving a soft landing, combined with its revised neutral rate expectations, has added more uncertainty to the markets. A key reason is the lack of clear forward guidance from Chair Powell. This meeting marked the first time in years where the market was uncertain whether the Fed would opt for a 25bps or 50bps rate cut. Additionally, the dot plot is losing its significance. Earlier this year, the median projection suggested three rate cuts for 2024, but by June, it had shifted to just one 25bps cut. Yet, within six weeks, the Fed not only delivered a 50bps cut but also projected another 50bps of easing by year-end.

This shift, along with the growing dispersion among FOMC members' forecasts, emphasizes the need for markets to brace for more uncertainty. Although the Fed's direction is clear, the pace of future cuts will be heavily influenced by upcoming economic data. Persistent recession risks, combined with the looming U.S. elections, signal that heightened volatility could persist in the months ahead.

Impact on the US Dollar

The U.S. dollar has traded on the weaker side throughout Q3, largely in anticipation of the Fed's rate cuts. However, the narrative of U.S. economic exceptionalism remains intact, a point emphasized by Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s remarks on the economy's resilience. While the "Dollar Smile" theory suggests the dollar could weaken in a soft-landing scenario, this would require other major economies to outperform the U.S.—a condition that currently seems unlikely. The Eurozone, China, and even Canada (now facing deflation) are showing no signs of eclipsing U.S. economic strength, despite some slowing in American growth.

That said, the dollar's trajectory remains data-dependent. Periods of weakness are possible if certain parts of the U.S. economy falter, but a sustained, structural selloff seems improbable. In fact, a broader global slowdown could bolster the dollar via haven demand. Moreover, upcoming U.S. elections could add volatility, with fiscal policy, tariffs, and geopolitical risks all influencing the currency’s direction. At this stage, the risk-reward remains tilted in favor of dollar strength rather than weakness and the outlook is balanced.