Quarterly Outlook
Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges
Althea Spinozzi
Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Sales Trader
Summary: The Crimea bridge blast last weekend destroyed a key supply route for Moscow’s forces in southern Ukraine. Putin was quick to retaliate by raining missiles over Kyiv and other cities after condemning the act as terrorism done by Ukrainian special services. This places the UN brokered grain deal in jeopardy with negotiations taking place now to extend it by a year. Elsewhere, OPEC+ cut output by 2 million barrels per day despite Western nations protests.
The Crimea bridge blast last weekend destroyed a key supply route for Moscow’s forces in southern Ukraine. Putin was quick to retaliate by raining missiles over Kyiv and other cities after condemning the act as terrorism done by Ukrainian special services. He did not spare the port of Odesa, which is considered one of the key grain export ports that Russia has agreed to allow normal export operations to continue via the Black Sea. The bombings has continued for over a week now with central Kyiv being hit by kamikaze drones early yesterday while heavy fighting is still happening at the war front in southeastern Ukraine.
Escalating tensions between Russia and Ukraine might see potential risk on grain supply. Prices in wheat (ZWZ2) and corn (ZCZ2) have gained as much as 7.5% and 3.3% respectively after the Kyiv bombings even though these moves look small compared to the ones we saw in the earlier part of this year.
To provide some numbers, Ukraine is currently one of the world’s leading exporter of grain. We have the breakdown below:
Percentage of global exports
Sunflower oil – 46%
Corn – 12%
Wheat – 9%
Rapeseed – 20%
Barley – 17%
UN brokered Grain Deal
Even though there is an existing UN-brokered deal to allow Ukraine to export grain via the Black Sea, this would expire in November and with tensions escalating between the two nations, there is a risk that this will not be extended a further year. The last time grain exports ceased due to the Russian invasion saw grain prices skyrocket as much as 60%. The market consensus is that it currently expects that the deal would be extended after some changes to the terms – primarily allowing a Russian pipeline to reopen to transport its ammonia fertilizer to Ukraine’s Odessa port for shipment. However, the move to boost Russia’s export revenues to fund the war indirectly might not sit well with US and Europe which has recently approved a Russian oil price cap to limit export revenue in Russia. U.N. aid chief Martin Griffiths and senior U.N. trade official Rebeca Grynspan has travelled to Moscow last week to discuss this issue.
OPEC+ Cut
Just as we thought supply side constraints were subsiding, we are now facing a possibility that commodity inflation might persist due to political uncertainties. Last week, OPEC+ made a key decision to slash oil output by 2 million barrels per day despite Western nations protesting the move as short sighted, perhaps prioritizing their agenda that maintaining oil revenue is more important than the global inflation problem or crippling Putin’s war now. This sent WTI crude oil rallying as much as 9% with rapid short covering as market was positioned with recessionary risk in mind. Oil has since given back some of those gains. The diverging interest of US and Saudi, both key oil producers globally can create instability in energy supplies.
The Fed
The US inflation breakdown in the month of September has shown lower inflation from energy while key drivers now are mostly from the demand/services side ( rent, medical, services and food). Because of this, the Fed has been relentless in utilizing every opportunity to reinforce their hawkishness with terminal fed funds rate now at 4.9%. If energy and agriculture prices start rising rapidly once again, this will provide the Fed even more ammunition to stay on the course despite some initial data that shows jobs growth is starting to cool off with vacancies falling 1 million in August. If supply constraints do not resolve, the combination of both demand and supply side factors does not bode well for equities and risk assets.
Disclaimer
The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.
Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-gb/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)