Chief Investment Strategist
Summary: More governments are realizing the threat big technology monopolies are to competition, economic growth and the states themselves. The information age has provided companies will tools to quell competition and lock vendors and customers into a highly profitable eco-system creating explosive earning growth. But with China's latest clampdown on the Ant Group IPO due to inadequate regulatory framework and the newly proposed rules to prohibit exclusivity behaviour by large Chinese technology companies the future for large technology companies might be changing. This is a big shift in attitude and something to think deeply about if you are a long-term investors in large technology companies.
Shares in Alibaba, Tencent, Xiaomi and JD.com were down today 9.8%, 7.4%, 8.2% and 9.2% respectively as new guidelines are being released by China’s State Administration for Market Regulation stating that practices such as demanding vendors to transact only on one platform and provided differentiated prices due to buying history could potentially be illegal under the new regulatory framework. Essentially, the Chinese government is drawing a line in the sand sending the signal that these technology companies are becoming too powerful relative to the state itself, but also that they are extracting too much profit from consumers while constraining competition.
These new antitrust regulations formulated in China comes just after the planned Ant Group IPO was postponed due to incomplete regulation of fintech companies providing financial services but without the traditional regulation of financial holding companies. Last month China also drafted a new personal data law that will make certain business practices of Chinese technology companies more difficult. These policy actions could longer lasting impact on these companies’ profitability and valuations. They all align China with Europe on the state’s role vs technology monopolies putting more pressure on the US to change its regulatory framework. It seems though that the US is also changing its stance on technology as we wrote about last month with the big 449-page report on competition in digital markets by the House Subcommittee on Antitrust.
For years we have been talking about technology monopolies being bad for competition and in the case of Europe how they have starved governments of tax revenue. The digital economy is very different from the economy we came from, as it enables companies to quell competition and extract profits at levels not seen since Standard Oil at the start of the previous century that started the world’s first antitrust regulation. The chart below shows Tencent’s net income since 2001. It is this type of compounding that is beginning to frighten government leaders.
Chart below is for regulatory purposes
Quarterly Outlook
Chief Investment Strategist
Quarterly Outlook
Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Quarterly Outlook
Chief Investment Strategist
Quarterly Outlook
Chief Investment Strategist
Quarterly Outlook
Head of Commodity Strategy
Quarterly Outlook
Chief Investment Strategist
Quarterly Outlook
Chief Investment Strategist
Quarterly Outlook
Chief Investment Strategist
Quarterly Outlook
Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Quarterly Outlook
Head of Commodity Strategy
Disclaimer
The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.
Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-gb/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)