Quarterly Outlook
Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges
Althea Spinozzi
Head of Fixed Income Strategy
Chief Macro Strategist
Summary: Difficult terrain lies ahead for US dollar traders as the US debt ceiling issue nears crunch time, possibly as soon as early June. Elsewhere, a lower than expected Q1 CPI number knocks NZD lower, while the RBA is set for major structural changes that will bring its structure and meeting frequency in line with global peers.
Today's Saxo Market Call podcast
Today's Global Market Quick Take: Europe from the Saxo Strategy Team
FX Trading focus: A difficult terrain ahead as debt ceiling crunch time approaches. RBA set for big structural changes.
The House Republicans came up with a complete non-starter of a budget bill that Senate Democrats will never pass, much less the veto-holding Biden administration. The bill looks to raise the debt limit by $1.5 trillion and reduce some $130 billion in spending next year, including axing many of the Biden administration’s hallmark initiatives, like canceling student debt and some of the climate- related programs (although details can be hammered out later). House speaker McCarthy claimed that the bill could save the government $4.5 trillion over the next decade. The House Republicans would have to show extreme discipline to get it passed even in the house as it can’t pass if they lose more than four votes from 222 possible.
What to do with the US dollar then? On the one hand, liquidity headwinds lie ahead and threaten risk sentiment headwinds and possibly USD upside. These come from the Fed continuing its QT while the US Treasury is set to drive a net liquidity drain from here. (Backgrounder: US treasury has been providing extensive liquidity as it drained hundreds of billions of USD from its account at the Fed. That account has now dwindled to about as low as it can go now, stopping that source of liquidity for now. And once the debt limit issue is cleared, the Treasury will set about rebuilding the account by hundreds of billions, driving even tighter liquidity.) But if the Biden administration and Congressional Republicans play a game of brinksmanship, it’s hard to imagine that process as a USD positive and will keep the Fed in a cautious stance. The situation could come to a head as soon as early June because of weaker than expected tax revenues, while otherwise late July has been considered the more likely pinch point at which time the US Treasury runs out of room with its special maneuvers. If sanity prevails and a handful of Republican House members cross the line, the issue can be avoided until possibly 2025, if the “Problem Solvers” caucus discussed in this article can get an alternative passed.
Sterling failed to get much out of yesterday’s hot CPI print, even as 2-year UK swap rates jumped 15 basis points on the news. GBPUSD couldn’t convincingly challenge the 1.2500 resistance again despite the yield spread widening to new extremes for the cycle. At present, the market is pricing BoE rates to be 25 basis points above Fed rates by year end. This is already difficult to swallow, much less any significant extension of the difference. Driving GBPUSD more than a figure or so higher at this point in the cycle would likely require some major US debt-limit related incident requiring eventual Fed liquidity injection. Expecting sterling to ramp higher because the BoE is finally getting more inflation-fighting religion is far less likely. EURGBP is back in the middle of the range it has traded within all year – still a non-story, though upside is likely the side of least resistance. GBPNOK has my contrarian warning lights flashing…
Chart: AUDNZD
While we await for something to give in either direction in the major USD pairs, the relative merits of AUD and NZD are worth consideration here after the kiwi was knocked lower in the wake of a lower than expected inflation number for Q1 at 1.2% QoQ and 6.7% YoY vs. 1.5%/6.9% expected, respectively and vs. 7.2% the prior quarter. This capped NZ yields and lowers the odds of a May rate hike from the RBNZ. From here, if inflation reheats, the RBA will have more work to do than the RBNZ to fight inflation. Meanwhile, an economic slowdown scenario would leave. With China’s economic activity picking up is normally an added potential benefit for the Aussie, although the key commodity prices coincident to that story are not offering much support to that story. See below for more on the RBA, which is set for a changed structure and meeting frequency that brings it into line with global peers. Next steps for firmly shifting focus back to the upside would be clearing the 200-day moving average and 1.1000 area.
Big changes ahead for the RBA: Following an independent review of the RBA ordered by the Australian government, sweeping recommendations for change were handed down today. Among these are that the RBA should create a new monetary policy board and meet less frequently (eight meetings per year, down from eleven), in better alignment with international counterparts. These were just some of the recommendations and were “welcomed” by the RBA. The report criticized the RBA’s board composition, which includes one economist and six independent directors who are mainly from business. The recommendations include a dilution of the Governor’s powers as more economist expertise would be brought onto the board. The changes could start from July 2024 and see the RBA governor speaking at a press conference after policy meetings. Current Governor Lowe’s term expires in September.
The Fed Beige Book released late yesterday suggests the US economy is in a holding pattern, with Fed observers claiming that consumer spending was flat to down slightly, while wage growth showed som moderation, while increasing slack in the labor market (evident in the recent rise in jobless claims) was also noted. A moderation of price increases was noted, while “several districts noted that banks tightened lending standards amid increased uncertainty and concerns about liquidity”. The banks reporting thus far show no general patterns of suffering deposit flight, though they may have compete more for retaining deposits than previously, and this will tighten the screws on overall credit growth.
Today’s Philly Fed worth watching: after the stunning April Empire Manufacturing survey, which came in at a stunning +10.8 versus expectations for –18 and –24.6 in March, it is worth watching today’s Philly Fed. More positive surprises in the regional surveys leading up to tomorrow’s preliminary S&P Global Apr. US Manufacturing PMI and the BLM’s ISM Manufacturing survey the week after next might indicate something is afoot in the US manufacturing sector. If so, is it the beginning of a turnaround due to huge announced investments in manufacturing that have been encouraged by the most sweeping US industrial policy initiatives since the second World War, including the Inflation Reduction Act and the CHIPS and Science Act? The setup for today’s April Philadelphia Fed survey is similar to the Empire number, with expectations for a reading of –19.3 after –23.2 in March. If the number comes in as weak as expected, then there is no corroboration of the Empire survey number, but if it swings into positive territory after the deepening negative prints in the last several months, it may point to a major reversal in the outlook for US manufacturing.
Table: FX Board of G10 and CNH trend evolution and strength.
NZD and especially NOK weakness worth noting, but CAD has also lost a lot of altitude here over the last couple of sessions as oil prices corrected lower. On the plus side, the Swiss franc continues its serene strength.
Table: FX Board Trend Scoreboard for individual pairs.
Note that EURCHF is approaching a pivot low near 0.9800, the low area since the zany swings during the March banking turmoil. USDCAD is trying to cement the reversal of the attempt through the 1.3400 area and 200-day moving average. Elsewhere, my contrarian pick for the next three months has to be GBPNOK, which just look so absurdly extended.
Upcoming Economic Calendar Highlights
Disclaimer
The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.
Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-gb/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)