Outrageous Predictions
Executive Summary: Outrageous Predictions 2026
Saxo Group
Saxo Group
Investment fees are the costs you pay for accessing financial products and services. These fees cover everything from managing your portfolio to executing trades and maintaining your account. While they might seem small at first glance, their costs can add up over time, reducing net returns compared with returns before fees.
Every fee you pay reduces the money available to grow your portfolio. For example, a stock portfolio earning 8% annually before fees with 1% in fees would result in around a 7% return after fees (ignoring taxes and other costs). Over decades, this difference can translate into a large difference in final portfolio value, depending on the amount invested and time period.
Recognising these costs and understanding their impact can help investors make more informed choices about costs and trade-offs.
Fees can be applied in different ways depending on the product, platform and market. Understanding the different types of fees may help you identify costs that are relevant to your portfolio.
Management fees compensate professionals who oversee your portfolio. Typically calculated as a percentage of assets under management (AUM)Ranges vary by region, product type and share class. For example, a 1% annual fee on a USD 100,000 portfolio would equal about USD 1,000 over a year, assuming the portfolio value stayed constant. Active management may seek to add value, but higher fees reduce net returns compared with a lower-fee version of the same return, all else equal. To outperform a benchmark after fees, an active strategy would need to deliver sufficient excess return to cover its total costs over the relevant period.
Expense ratios are applied to mutual funds and ETFs to cover operational costs. These fees, expressed as a percentage of fund assets, often range from under 0.1% to over 1%, but ranges vary by region, product and share class. Even minor differences compound over time, making low-cost options more appealing for long-term portfolios. Generally speaking, passively managed funds (including some mutual funds and ETFs) can be less expensive than actively managed funds and ETFs) often have lower expense ratios than actively managed funds, although this is not always the case.
Trading fees are charges linked to buying or selling investments. A broker may charge a flat fee per trade, a percentage of the transaction, or other costs depending on the market and product. For frequent traders, these costs may add up over time. Platforms advertising zero-commission trading may still involve other costs, such as spreads, foreign exchange charges, custody fees or product-related costs. Reviewing the full fee schedule can help investors understand the total cost of trading rather than focusing only on commission.
Load fees are sales charges tied to mutual funds. Front-end loads apply when you buy shares, while back-end loads are charged when selling. The level of these fees varies by fund, share class and market. These fees can reach up to 5.75%. Opting for no-load funds keeps your money working harder. No-load funds do not apply front-end or back-end sales loads, although they may still have other ongoing costs.
Often associated with financial advisors, advisory fees cover portfolio management and planning services. These fees usually range from 0.25% to 1% annually, but they can vary by provider, service level, portfolio size and market. Some platforms may also charge account maintenance, custody or platform fees. Lower-cost platforms and robo-advisors may offer more limited or different services at lower cost.
Some funds charge performance fees when returns exceed a specified benchmark or hurdle rate. For example, a "2 and 20" structure charges 2% of assets annually and 20% of profits. These fees link manager compensation to performance, but they can also reduce investor returns when the performance-fee conditions are met. While these fees incentivise results, they can substantially reduce your net returns if they exceed the threshold amount. These funds are common in alternative investment assets such as hedge funds. Performance fees are often associated with alternative investment structures such as hedge funds and private equity funds, and can be controversial because incentives may influence risk-taking and time horizons, depending on the structure.
In the US, some mutual funds charge 12b-1 fees for distribution and, in some cases, shareholder services. These fees are paid from fund assets and form part of ongoing fund costs. They are more relevant to US mutual funds than to ETFs, so investors should check whether they apply to the specific fund and share class being reviewed.
Redemption fees apply when you sell certain investments too quickly, discouraging short-term trading. Transfer fees, often charged when moving accounts between brokers, can vary by provider and market. Reviewing fee schedules before making changes may help avoid these costs.
Investment fees might seem small, but their impact can reduce long-term portfolio values, all else equal. This is especially relevant for long-term investors because fees can affect the amount left to compound.
Assume an initial investment of USD 100,000, a constant 8% annual return before fees, no additional contributions or withdrawals, and no taxes, trading costs or inflation. If fees reduce the annual return by the stated percentage, the simplified result after 30 years would be approximately.
In this simplified example, the difference between the 0.25% and 2% fee assumptions is about USD 364,400 in final portfolio value. This includes both the fees and the lost compounding on money no longer invested.
Actively managed funds often charge higher fees, than broad passive funds, although costs vary by fund, provider and share class. While active funds may aim to outperform a benchmark, consistent outperformance after fees can be difficult.
In contrast, passively managed options like index funds and ETFs often have lower expense ratios, although costs vary. Over time, lower costs reduce the drag from fees, all else equal.
Every dollar spent on fees is a dollar that doesn't get reinvested. This reduces not only immediate returns but also the future compounding potential, depending on investment returns. Lowering fees keeps more money in your account, allowing compound interest to work in your favour.
Investment fees reduce net returns over time, all else equal Here's how to reduce them while still considering product features, risk and investment objectives:
Index funds and ETFs often have expense ratios below 0.1%, making them lower-cost options for long-term investors, depending on the product and market. Actively managed funds, on the other hand, tend to charge higher fees, typically exceeding 1%. Low-cost options are generally more beneficial unless a fund consistently outperforms the market after fees. Lower-cost products reduce the fee drag, all else equal, but investors should also compare.
Load fees reduce the amount invested or the amount received when selling, depending on whether they are charged upfront or at exit. Load fees can take up to 5.75% of your investment, cutting into your returns before your money has a chance to grow. No-load mutual funds offer a better alternative, as they don't charge upfront or back-end sales fees, allowing your full investment to work for you from day one. No-load mutual funds avoid these sales charges, although they may still have expense ratios, platform fees or other costs.
Frequent trading may increase total costs, especially where commissions, spreads, FX costs or taxes apply. Many platforms now offer zero-commission trading for stocks and ETFs, but reviewing their fee structures for other potential charges is essential. Fewer trades may reduce transaction costs and, depending on local rules, may affect tax outcomes.
Fee calculators, fund documents and platform comparison tools may help investors compare visible costs across products and platforms. These tools can show differences in expense ratios, advisory fees, trading fees and platform charges. Reviewing fund prospectuses or key information documents can also improve visibility of disclosed costs, although costs should be assessed alongside risk, exposure and product features.
Investment fees are often overlooked, yet they may have a meaningful effect on long-term portfolio values. Controlling these costs leaves more of your portfolio’s gross returns available to you.
It’s important to remember, though, that lower-cost products may reduce fee drag, but they do not protect against market volatility or guarantee better performance.
Reviewing costs and product features can help investors understand trade-offs; lower ongoing costs can improve net returns all else equal, but outcomes remain uncertain.
DIY investing: How broker platforms empower investors to take control
Why reinvesting dividends is essential for compounding growth
Price-to-Earnings ratio explained: What it is and how to use it
How dividends work: A comprehensive guide to dividend investing