2024_10_21_Countdown4_M

US Election Countdown: Markets are preparing for Trump 2.0.

US Election 2024 4 minutes to read
Picture of John Hardy
John J. Hardy

Global Head of Macro Strategy

Summary:  With just two weeks until the election, the betting odds have recently tilted strongly in favour of a Trump 2.0, with Trump winning and Republican control of Congress. Markets are responding in kind. But what are the risks?


2024 US Election countdown. With only two weeks to go...

The polls this week say:
2024_10_21_ElectionWeekly_PollsThisWeek
Polling numbers are according to fivethirtyeight.com, a polling aggregator.

The oddsmakers this week say:
2024_10_21_ElectionWeekly_OddsThisWeek
Betting odds numbers are according to polymarket.com, a real-money betting site for event outcomes.

This week: Betting odds and markets are prepping for Trump 2.0. But is it a fair assessment?

The US election polls have continued to drift slightly in Trump’s favour over the past couple of weeks, a continuation of the slow tightening in the polls since late August.

But betting odds on polymarket.com have shifted violently in favour of Trump winning, a move that started forming about two weeks ago. Furthermore, the polymarket.com odds of a Trump 2.0, or a “Republican sweep” in which the Republicans also take control of both house of Congress, have risen well above 40%.

And we can point to ways the markets are responding to these higher odds of Trump 2.0. But are markets and investors getting ahead of themselves here?

Chart of the week: Two ETFs suggesting that markets are pricing in Trump 2.0

 

2024_10_21_financialsVersusbonds

As noted in this article, markets are pricing increased odds of a Trump 2.0 scenario in which both Trump wins and the Republicans have control of both houses of Congress post-election. The latter is critical for Trump’s full agenda to see the light of day. The chart above shows two ETFs that show how the market is bracing for a Trump 2.0 outcome. The first is in black, it’s an ETF of the largest US financial services companies, which are rising on the anticipation of more Trump corporate tax cuts and deregulation. The second is in blue. It is an ETF of long-term US treasury bonds, which are falling as US interest rates go higher. This is because the Trump 2.0 agenda is seen as both inflationary and positive for US growth, but also as Trump 2.0 would see US deficits worsen. Note the dramatic acceleration higher in the financial services ETF and the weakening of the US treasury ETF around 10 trading days ago, around the time in which Trump’s winning odds spiked higher. Other market developments that suggest markets are bracing for Trump 2.0 are the rising price of gold, as most see a Republican sweep bringing much higher inflation and greater geopolitical tensions, a weak Mexican peso on the fear that Trump’s threatened tariffs would weaken Mexico’s manufacturing sector as exports to the US would drop, and higher crypto prices as Trump has loudly pitched himself as pro-crypto.

(Specifically, the ETFs in the chart above are: 1) QDVH: The iShares S&P 500 Financial Sector UCITS ETF. As its name implies, it holds the large banks and financial services companies within the US S&P 500 index like JP Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and others. 2) IUSV: The iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+year UCITS ETF, which holds US treasury notes and T-bonds of 20-year or greater maturities.)

Are the betting odds the real odds?

While the odds of a Trump victory have been grinding steadily higher in the polling shifts of recent weeks, the speed of the shift in the betting odds over the last couple of weeks has been far from subtle. What drove this? A Wall Street Journal article probing into the matter unearthed that a handful of accounts were behind much of the shift in odds. The article focused on the betting behaviour in polymarket.com, the largest transparent market for betting on the election outcome, with now more than USD 2.2 billion in bets placed for the election winner alone. It noted that four large accounts quickly placed some USD 30 million in bets in favour of a Trump win. The accounts were all funded from the crypto exchange Kraken, and the timing and increased size of their betting was very similar. Furthermore, the accounts have also all bet on outcomes in favour of Trump winning in individual swing states and even winning the national popular vote, which most consider extremely unlikely.

It’s hard to draw any firm conclusion from these developments, even if it does point to a single person or organization that has now tilted the real-money odds of the election outcome, as other betting markets have also shifted in favour of a Trump win. Elon Musk, now a very loud Trump supporter, has also referenced the shift in polymarket.com, arguing that betting odds are more accurate than polls. But there is a real effect: observers point out that betting odds can shape public opinion as news and social media cover the phenomenon and create buzz in favour of Trump.

Let’s remember: Trump 2.0 is a very different from “Trump gridlock”.

The conclusion here is that betting odds may or may not be overstating the overall odds of a Trump win. Tightening polls do point to higher odds of a Trump victory, due to the US’ odd electoral college system for choosing presidents in the election. (Remember: Trump won in 2016 despite losing the overall popular vote by 2.1% to Clinton.) But other odds on polymarket.com look suspicious. In particular, the site suggests that the odds of a Trump 2.0 or “Republican sweep” as they call it, are currently 42%. If the polls are correct that Harris is likely to win the overall popular vote, the House of Representatives may be more difficult for the Republicans to take than these odds suggest. Currently, polymarket.com has the “Trump gridlock” scenario, in which Trump wins, but the Republicans don’t win control of the House of Representatives, at only 16%.

As we have covered in recent weeks, Trump 2.0 and that “Trump gridlock” scenario are two very different outcomes for policy and for the markets. With Trump gridlock, the markets will mostly only get some of the Trump tariffs and a Trump foreign policy and none of the Trump tax cuts or deregulation. This is night and day for market reactions in the immediate wake of the election. In short, even if Trump shows signs of winning early on election night, investors and traders will need to focus intently on how the House election races are shaping up as well.

See you next week!

About the author: John is Saxo’s Chief Macro Strategist, with over twenty-five years’ experience in the financial markets, chiefly as Saxo’s former Head of FX Strategy. He is also an American, having grown up in Houston, TX and has a long-standing passion for following the course of US elections and their place in history since being allowed to stay up late as a young kid to watch the 1980 election results roll in and Ronald Reagan winning the presidency over Jimmy Carter.

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Upending the global order at blinding speed

    Quarterly Outlook

    Upending the global order at blinding speed

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

    We are witnessing a once-in-a-lifetime shredding of the global order. As the new order takes shape, ...
  • Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity outlook: The high cost of global fragmentation for US portfolios

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Quarterly Outlook

    Asset allocation outlook: From Magnificent 7 to Magnificent 2,645—diversification matters, now more than ever

    Jacob Falkencrone

    Global Head of Investment Strategy

  • Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Commodities rally despite global uncertainty

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Quarterly Outlook

    China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Quarterly Outlook

    Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Althea Spinozzi

    Head of Fixed Income Strategy

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900
Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

Select region

International
International

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.