Trump’s tariff pause sparks rally – What comes next?

Key points:

• The market’s sharp rally reflects relief, not resolution: Trump’s 90-day tariff pause eased immediate fears, but the broader macro backdrop—defined by rising protectionism and policy volatility—remains unchanged.
• Policy remains reactive and unpredictable: The administration’s pivot was triggered by market signals and recession warnings, underscoring the need for investors to stay nimble in a rapidly shifting environment.
• Investors should focus on resilience and flexibility: With continued uncertainty over U.S.–China trade, the next three months are likely to be volatile. Positioning around quality, tactical defensives, and disciplined risk management will be key.

Markets staged a dramatic reversal Wednesday, led by a 12% surge in the Nasdaq and strong gains across major indices, following President Trump’s unexpected decision to pause tariff escalation for non-retaliating trade partners. The move was a clear reaction to growing market stress and heightened recession concerns—a recalibration, not a reversal.

The key takeaway is this: the rally reflects a short-term easing of tail risks, not a change in the broader macro or policy trajectory.

What caused Trump to blink?

President Trump cited input from prominent financial voices—such as JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon and his warnings about recession. He also acknowledged the bond market’s role in the administration’s rethink, noting, “The bond market is very tricky... I saw last night where people were getting a little queasy.”

The message is clear: the selloff in risk assets pressured the White House into softening its tariff posture, at least temporarily. This highlights just how reactive current policy has become—and reinforces the need for investors to remain nimble in the face of unpredictable decision-making.

What changed—and what didn’t?

The headline:

• A 90-day pause on full tariff implementation for non-retaliating countries, with a temporary 10% rate applied.
• No further increase on China, despite a prior hike to 125% remaining in place.

The reality:

• The effective trade-weighted tariff rate remains close to 25%—with a 10% baseline on 75 trading partners and 125% on China.
• What has changed is the distribution of tariffs, with a heavier concentration on China and fewer broad-based increases on U.S. allies.
• There is still no resolution with China, and talks remain uncertain.

Key questions going forward

Active investors should monitor the following developments closely:

• China’s response – Beijing has already countered with an 84% tariff rate on U.S. goods. Any additional escalation or targeted retaliation could quickly unwind recent gains and refocus markets on the risks to global supply chains and demand.
• Consumer impact – With China now bearing the brunt of U.S. trade pressure, the cost burden is likely to fall more directly on U.S. importers and consumers. This could lead to renewed margin pressures for multinationals and temper consumer demand into the second half of the year.
• Three-month window likely to be volatile – The negotiation period ahead for the US and its trading partners is expected to be punctuated by headline-driven blips, mixed messaging, and shifting market expectations. It is unlikely to provide the kind of policy stability or direction that would give companies the confidence to resume normal business operations or revise strategic outlooks.
• Corporate reaction and forward guidance – While the 90-day pause provides some breathing room, it may not offer enough clarity for CEOs to reinstate forward guidance or commit to capital spending. Many companies are likely to adopt a “wait-and-see” approach, given the fluid policy environment and the lack of a clear path to resolution.
• Structural shift toward protectionism – Despite the near-term relief, the broader economic paradigm remains intact: a steady retreat from free trade toward a more fragmented, protectionist global order. This shift is accompanied by elevated policy volatility and a diminished ability for businesses to plan effectively.
• Credibility gap and policy uncertainty – The Trump administration’s erratic policy signals continue to undermine strategic planning, both for corporates and investors. The reversal on tariffs was reactive, not strategic, and reinforces the sense that economic policy is being driven by market optics rather than a coherent framework.

Seeking stability amid the storm

As the policy environment remains fluid, active investors should prioritize resilience over reaction.

• Focus on quality: Companies with strong balance sheets and pricing power are best positioned to weather further volatility.
• Be tactical with defensives: Sectors like utilities may come back into favor quickly if recession risks re-emerge. Healthcare, however, faces policy risks with Trump touting tariffs on pharma companies, while selectivity may be key in consumer staples based on the resilience of their supply chains.
• Manage fixed income exposure: Keep duration and credit risk in check amid persistent bond market volatility.
• Stay flexible: The next 90 days are likely to bring more noise than clarity. Use pullbacks to rebalance, not chase.