Quarterly Outlook
Macro Outlook: The US rate cut cycle has begun
Peter Garnry
Chief Investment Strategist
Chief Macro Strategist
Summary: Trump 2.0 could prove the most significant political revolution in two generations. This week, we consider three major implications of what just happened.
The US election is over and proved the pollsters once again disastrously wrong and the mid-to-late October betting odds predicting a strong Trump victory remarkably right. The result comes as a shock as many, including this author, were misled by sudden changes in Harris’ winning odds just ahead of the election.
And rather than the nail-biting, closely contested election that so many feared would be the case based on the extremely tight polls up to Election Day, we instead have a clear and resounding victory for Trump and the Republican party, which will control both houses of Congress.
This week, we consider three major implications of Trump 2.0 as we attempt to assess the full impact of this historic event on global financial markets, and on world history in general.There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen. – Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
The historic 2024 US Election gave Donald Trump a resounding victory and the Republicans full control of Congress. This amounted to a political revolution that was a stinging rejection of the establishment and gives Trump and the Republicans a potent political mandate. It will mean enormous changes and possibly even a wholesale reshaping of the US- and global economy. That’s our focus below. But first, a brief look at a big winner and a big loser in the wake of the election.
This was by far the most significant political revolution since the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, when Reagan slashed taxes and started a massive deregulation push, one that peaked later in the Clinton presidency, when his Treasury secretary supercharged the big US banks aggressive risk-taking by orchestrating the unwinding of the Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act.
What the second election of Trump might bring is not fully clear, but an overwhelming victory for a totally anti-establishment party means that Trump has the mandate, should his team prove skillful enough in using it, to completely transform US government. This means everything from slashing spending and reducing taxes to enacting new widespread deregulation measures and of course, imposing massive tariffs that disrupt the globalized economy. In relations with other nations, Trump will enjoy the immense power that a US President has always had in foreign relations.
It’s important to point out that Trump 2.0 will look very different from Trump 1.0. In his first administration, he had no political experience, got less of the popular vote than Hilary Clinton, and chose many establishment figures for key posts that told him what he could and could not do. There were notable policy moves, but also plenty of noise and confusion in his policy-making. He has learned from that experience and has a vastly more experienced and professional team this time around, one that is more consistently anti-establishment. And as we will hopefully look at next week, he also has access to powerful billionaires offering their “services” for shaping policy.
The market has reacted, but things don’t move in a straight line.
Ahead of the election, many had sketched out scenarios of how the market would react in the event of a Trump 2.0 outcome. The initial reaction largely proved them right: equities celebrated, small cap stocks and bank stocks roared higher, the US dollar rose sharply, and US treasury yields remain quite high, all on the assumption that we’ll see a rip-roaring US economy on Trump's pro-business agenda.
But will it be so simple? What if we have Trump moving quickly on tariffs, which are inflationary and bad for growth, and slower or not at all on corporate tax cuts because some in Congress are concerned that the US can’t afford even larger budget deficits? What if US treasury markets rebel at Trump’s intended policies and interest rates spike higher, which slows the economy as credit markets seize up? In short, there are many dynamics at work that could move markets in both directions and investors should take a careful approach when we don’t yet know what the famed “first 100 days” of a new presidency will – and won’t – bring.
This election will echo around the globe.
The US is the world’s largest economy and shifts in demand from American consumers are felt far and wide, as are any moves in its stock and bond markets – both by far the world’s largest. On the economic front, Trump tariffs have the potential to impact global inflation (higher for the US, possibly lower elsewhere), global economic growth. And if Trump policies continue to send US treasury yields and the US dollar spiking higher, that will tighten global financial conditions as well. On top of that, there are the traditional direct geopolitical impacts from a US president, who enjoys considerable freedom in foreign policy moves. The war in Ukraine and the Middle East are the most urgent issues where Trump’s decisions will have huge impact, as will whether he singles out China for especially large tariffs. Would China retaliate or try to convince Trump to make some kind of deal that somehow makes him look good but avoids the worst of the feared impacts? All in all, this Trump 2.0 scenario brings the maximum potential for US policy to change the rules for the global economy and geopolitics because of Trump’s powerful mandate and because he goes against much of the traditional neo-conservative agenda of the Biden administration.
This article series will conclude with next week’s edition. See you next week!
About the author: John is Saxo’s Chief Macro Strategist, with over twenty-five years’ experience in the financial markets, chiefly as Saxo’s former Head of FX Strategy. He is also an American, having grown up in Houston, TX and has a long-standing passion for following the course of US elections and their place in history since being allowed to stay up late as a young kid to watch the 1980 election results roll in and Ronald Reagan winning the presidency over Jimmy Carter.
Disclaimer
The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.
Please read our disclaimers:
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-gb/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)