Meta vs. Alphabet: Has the Tide Turned?

Meta vs. Alphabet: Has the Tide Turned?

Equities
Charu Chanana

Chief Investment Strategist

Key points:

  • Meta’s AI-driven ad strategy is delivering stronger returns, while Alphabet’s AI investments face skepticism, especially in Search.
  • Meta’s profitability and cost discipline are outpacing Google, with better operating margins and more efficient capital spending.
  • Risks differ as Meta is heavily dependent on ad revenue and economic cycles, while Alphabet faces a potential DOJ settlement and AI competition in Search.

In the competitive landscape of tech giants, Meta Platforms (META) has recently outperformed Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL), the parent company of Google. The relative stock price of Meta vs. Alphabet has reached a 7-year high, raising the question whether Meta’s outperformance has just began, or has it gone too far?

Meta’s AI Monetization Justifies its AI Spend

Meta is pouring a massive $65 billion into capital expenditures (capex), primarily for AI infrastructure, and investors are rewarding it. The stock has surged as Meta has effectively leveraged artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance ad targeting and optimize performance, bringing tangible improvements in engagement and revenue growth.

Meanwhile, Alphabet’s $75 billion capital spend rattled investors, given the tangible returns on AI investments have been less evident so far. In fact, investors are concerned that AI-powered search tools such as ChatGPT and Perplexity AI could disrupt Google’s core search advertising model rather than enhance it.

Meta’s Cost Discipline and Soaring Margins

Despite its aggressive AI spending, Meta’s operating margins are soaring. Meta’s 2024 operating margin of 54% is a big jump from 41% in 2022. The company has maintained a stable ratio of capex to operating cash flow, lower than 2021 and 2022 levels, while still seeing strong earnings growth. Meanwhile, Alphabet’s capex growth in 2024 of 63% has outpaced its profit growth of 29%, a sign that its spending isn’t translating into immediate bottom-line gains.

Both companies have made significant cuts to improve efficiency, but Meta’s turnaround feels more dramatic. After its painful “Year of Efficiency” in 2023, Meta has emerged as a leaner, more focused company. Alphabet has also streamlined operations, but regulatory concerns and AI uncertainties still loom over its long-term growth.

Source: Bloomberg, Saxo

Meta’s Lead in Social Engagement vs. Google’s Search Dependence

Meta owns Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, which remain dominant in user engagement. These platforms generate massive first-party data crucial for ad targeting.

Meanwhile, Google’s core revenue still relies on Search ads, which, while highly profitable, face new challenges from AI-powered search experiences (e.g., ChatGPT, Perplexity AI). If AI-driven answers reduce search queries, it could impact Google’s ad revenue model.

Regulatory Overhangs: Meta Clears Hurdles, Google Faces DOJ Risks

For years, Meta was in the regulatory hot seat, facing scrutiny over data privacy and competition concerns. But in 2024, those worries largely faded. TikTok once posed a major threat, but the regulatory risks surrounding the Chinese app have largely eased.

Alphabet, however, is facing antitrust cases from the US Department of Justice (DOJ) to prevent it from maintaining its monopoly in online search and other areas. If there is no settlement, that could Alphabet’s ability to maintain dominance in search and digital advertising.


What Could Go Wrong for Meta?

  1. Meta’s Economic Dependence: With 98% of its revenue coming from advertising, Meta is highly cyclical. If the economy weakens or unemployment rises, small and medium-sized businesses—the backbone of Meta’s ad revenue—could pull back on spending. Google, by contrast, has a more diversified revenue base, with 22% coming from cloud services, subscriptions, and other sources.
  2. DeepSeek Cheap AI Models Could Shake Things Up: China’s DeepSeek AI project, with a $6 billion spending, could reshape the AI competitive landscape, questioning all of the big capex spenders in the AI space. Meta’s capex growth is projected to outpace profit growth in 2025, raising questions about whether the company can maintain its current efficiency. Alphabet’s capex is also expected to rise faster than profit, but at a slower rate than Meta’s.
  3. YouTube’s AI Growth Potential: YouTube has been one of Alphabet’s brightest spots, with AI-powered content discovery boosting engagement and ad revenue. If this momentum broadens, it could offset some of the challenges in Google’s core search business.
  4. Valuation: How Much More Upside? Alphabet is trading at 20x forward earnings, right around its 5-year average. Meta, in contrast, trades at 27x – way above its 5-year average of 19.5x. This gives more room for Alphabet to expand its multiple compared to Meta.

Bottom Line: The Risk-Reward Balance

Meta has outperformed Alphabet in recent months, fueled by AI-driven ad growth, improving margins, and regulatory tailwinds. But with economic risks, rising capex, and valuation concerns, it may not have unlimited upside from here.

Alphabet, meanwhile, is at a crossroads. If AI enhances its core businesses rather than disrupts them, its lower valuation could make it an attractive long-term play. But if regulatory risks and AI cannibalization persist, it could struggle to keep up.

For now, Wall Street is favoring Meta – but the race is far from over!

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Quarterly Outlook

    China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Quarterly Outlook

    Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Althea Spinozzi

    Head of Fixed Income Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: Will lower rates lift all boats in equities?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: Will lower rates lift all boats in equities?

    Peter Garnry

    Chief Investment Strategist

    After a period of historically high equity index concentration driven by the 'Magnificent Seven' sto...
  • Commodity Outlook: Gold and silver continue to shine bright

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Gold and silver continue to shine bright

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Macro Outlook: The US rate cut cycle has begun

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro Outlook: The US rate cut cycle has begun

    Peter Garnry

    Chief Investment Strategist

    The Fed started the US rate cut cycle in Q3 and in this macro outlook we will explore how the rate c...
  • FX Outlook: USD in limbo amid political and policy jitters

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX Outlook: USD in limbo amid political and policy jitters

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

    As we enter the final quarter of 2024, currency markets are set for heightened turbulence due to US ...

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-mena/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)


Business Hills Park – Building 4,
4th Floor, office 401, Dubai Hills Estate, P.O. Box 33641, Dubai, UAE

Contact Saxo

Select region

UAE
UAE

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.