European Recovery Fund : Michel’s new negotiation box

European Recovery Fund : Michel’s new negotiation box

Macro
Christopher Dembik

Head of Macroeconomic Research

Summary:  Last week, the president of the EUCO, Charles Michel, unveiled his compromise proposal for the MFF (Multi-Financial Framework) and the recovery plan "Next Generation EU" which is likely to be very close to what the final outcome will be. Ahead of the physical EUCO meeting on July 17 and 18, negotiations at top-level continue with a meeting between Prime Minister Conte and Chancellor Merkel, who holds the rotating EU presidency until the end of the year, in Berlin today.


Council President Michel unveiled its compromise for the recovery plan last week (see here). We believe it is quite close to what the final outcome will be.


Key proposals

  • Michel proposes to cut the MFF for the period 2021-27 by €26bn, from €1,100bn to €1,074bn and to maintain rebates for Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, Austria and Denmark – which can be interpreted as a concession made in order to obtain the support of these countries to the recovery fund’s proposal. In addition, new resources should be allocated to the EU budget, via three levies: plastic levy, digital levy and carbon adjustment mechanism. He also suggests to set up a €5bn Brexit reserve for most affected countries and sectors in case the UK-EU negotiations derail.

     

  • Regarding the one-off four-year recovery fund “Next Generation EU”, which remains as one of the thorniest subjects, Michel supports the EC’s proposal concerning the size of the package and the initial grants/loans ratio. The total stimulus is maintained at €750bn and composed of 1/3 loans and 2/3 transfers in order to avoid over-indebtedness of the most hurt countries. As expected, there is some form of conditionality attached to the disbursement of the funds, notably: rule of law conditionality (which might raises concern in Poland and Hungary), climate goals and country specific recommendations. All the national recovery plans need to be approved by the EUCO at qualified majority, and no unanimity as the Netherlands wanted. The idea behind this change is to avoid that a single country could block ad vitam aeternam the process of disbursement of the funds. Finally, it is planned that debt repayment for loans will start in 2026.

Comment

We believe that Michel’s proposal is quite close to what the final outcome will be. There are still points of disagreements (unanimity/qualified majority for the approval of the national recovery plans and rule of law conditionality) but these are not insuperable. It seems that there is already an agreement on the most important aspects of the recovery plan: its size and its composition. This is already a major step forward compared with where we were a few weeks ago. The overall new negotiation box is clearly much better for climate (with the introduction of climate change goals) and for governance of the recovery facility. Hopefully, the concessions made to the Frugals regarding the smaller size of the MFF – which is a mistake if we only think in terms of long-term investment – and rebates will be enough to work out a deal this week. If not, a new extraordinary EUCO meeting might be scheduled within a couple of weeks in order to reach an agreement before the summer break – which is the deadline proposed by Chancellor Merkel. It’s now not so much a question of if but when the agreement is signed. All member states understand quite well that given the magnitude of the crisis they have no right to fail, they are doomed to find a compromise.

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Quarterly Outlook

    China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Quarterly Outlook

    Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Althea Spinozzi

    Head of Fixed Income Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: Will lower rates lift all boats in equities?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: Will lower rates lift all boats in equities?

    Peter Garnry

    Chief Investment Strategist

    After a period of historically high equity index concentration driven by the 'Magnificent Seven' sto...
  • Commodity Outlook: Gold and silver continue to shine bright

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Gold and silver continue to shine bright

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Macro Outlook: The US rate cut cycle has begun

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro Outlook: The US rate cut cycle has begun

    Peter Garnry

    Chief Investment Strategist

    The Fed started the US rate cut cycle in Q3 and in this macro outlook we will explore how the rate c...
  • FX Outlook: USD in limbo amid political and policy jitters

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX Outlook: USD in limbo amid political and policy jitters

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

    As we enter the final quarter of 2024, currency markets are set for heightened turbulence due to US ...

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-mena/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)


Business Hills Park – Building 4,
4th Floor, office 401, Dubai Hills Estate, P.O. Box 33641, Dubai, UAE

Contact Saxo

Select region

UAE
UAE

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.