Macro Digest: Why the Fed is more likely to pause today than hike.

Macro Digest: Why the Fed is more likely to pause today than hike.

Macro
Steen Jakobsen

Chief Investment Officer

Summary:  As market conditions have calmed over the last few sessions, a strong majority of market participants are looking for the Fed to hike the Fed Funds rate another 25 basis points today. But we see a strong risk of a Fed pause here as the Fed may prefer throw itself into neutral here rather than having to execute a pivot to cutting rates not long after hiking them again because the situation has deteriorated further.


What: Tonight’s FOMC meeting
Consensus: +25 basis points (85%+ probability priced)
M
y call: No change (75% probability)

Disclaimer: I have no special insight, just trying to weigh as many variables as possible here. The bottom line is that the Fed may decide it is preferable to pause now and then either resume hiking if financial conditions calm quickly since inflation is still a pressing concern, or quickly start cutting if conditions deteriorate badly and the economy is seen at risk. More embarrassing to hike now only to have to quickly pivot later.

The arguments in favor of hiking 25 basis points:                                   

  • The ECB last week did well to stay focused on inflation credentials, which was again confirmed in a speech from President Lagarde this morning, by the same token Fed Powell could use this “model”, even if his hand is weaker as ECB didn’t have any bank troubles, Powell does and the fundamental problem of securing 4,300 regional & local bank in the US is now political and always has been.
  • If there had been no banking crisis, Fed would have hiked 50 bps tonight – 25 bps is compromise and if it comes with signal of “pause” – it probably has the right balance of “stepping down” when also reinforced with a clear signal of FOMC moving to pause if trouble continues. Market could interpret this as Fed saying: “We are data dependent....But we also have “data patience”.
  • Inflation remains high despite energy being on the low. Any mean-reversion going forward on energy would increase likelihood of sticky inflation for long. (Comment: Technically an interesting “Hammer” has formed in oil charts yesterday and Brent is at least 5$ below 80-100 $ range expected by commodity traders and the net demand increases seen from China)
  • Tactically there is no doubt that that delivering what the market expects is assumed to create the least room for interpretations of why the Fed surprised. (Comment: No one knows!!)
  • The baseline is important (H/T: MG) Pre-crisis we were at nearly 5.75% for the Fed terminal rate. The market is now under 5.00 and December is priced at below 4.50%, i.e., for cuts. In order to get these cuts, credit conditions would need to be 25% worse than they are now (they are poor already) – Meaning on fair valuation, the market has priced too much in the forward curve and delivering +25 bps would off-set some of that and send the right signal to the market.

Arguments in favour of a Fed pause today:

  • The market is pricing 50 bps (2 Fed cuts) between peak rates at this meeting or next and December 2023. Why would FOMC move rates up only to have to do embarrassing U-turn at the next meeting (Mind you the US short-end moves rates up +/- 50 bps every three hours over the last week or the equivalent of 2 FED cut/hikes, so why should we give this any credit?)
  • Regional and local banks are critical to the US economy. The US is unique in its banking structure needing 4,300 banks to service rural America. These banks are as much as 150-175 years old and a central instrument for keeping local America financed and growing. This means political capital is behind these banks and as such they are “untouchable”. This means Powell will need to back Treasury Sec Yellen on blanket support for deposits well knowing such a scheme has no chance in passing Congress. This is not only about political capital but also about “market functioning”. The fact is money is still leaving regional banks in size.
  • Going to pause directly is far more credible than hiking now only to cut next time. The outside risk is a +25 bps would be similar to Trichet’s hike into the 2008 crisis (considered the worst central move ever anywhere – but of course employment was much worse then) – tactically zero is the right medicine in times of uncertainty. The truth is no one knows if Fed in 18 month have hiked 100-150 bps or cut them by same amount!
  • Finally my 4-Factor Models: Monetary indicates that if the Fed hikes, it will make things worse: The 4-factor model on monetary is neutral on financial conditions. We are exactly at the average for the last year. Bond volatility is trading in the fourth quartile: Index 80 is the long-term average expected and the 12-month average is index 126: we are at 162 despite “calm” returning over last 48 hours) This favors no change. Dollar Index: neutral. FED next 18 months – indicates 109 bps of cuts. This is low of the last 12 months and favors cuts.

Source: Bloomberg
  • The 4-factor Credit model is even clearer. The AT1 ETF, a proxy for banking crisis after Credit Suisse ATF debt was wiped out, is at a low. Inflation fixing 12-month forward is at 283 bps – well inside what Fed could expect (ie. Not alarming inflation expectations) Credit spreads show moderate stress, sitting well above average: +481 Bps vs. 12-month average of 398 bps.
Source: Bloomberg

Quarterly Outlook

01 /

  • Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro outlook: Trump 2.0: Can the US have its cake and eat it, too?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: The ride just got rougher

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Quarterly Outlook

    China Outlook: The choice between retaliation or de-escalation

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

  • Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: A bumpy road ahead calls for diversification

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX outlook: Tariffs drive USD strength, until...?

    John J. Hardy

    Global Head of Macro Strategy

  • Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Quarterly Outlook

    Fixed Income Outlook: Bonds Hit Reset. A New Equilibrium Emerges

    Althea Spinozzi

    Head of Fixed Income Strategy

  • Equity Outlook: Will lower rates lift all boats in equities?

    Quarterly Outlook

    Equity Outlook: Will lower rates lift all boats in equities?

    Peter Garnry

    Chief Investment Strategist

    After a period of historically high equity index concentration driven by the 'Magnificent Seven' sto...
  • Commodity Outlook: Gold and silver continue to shine bright

    Quarterly Outlook

    Commodity Outlook: Gold and silver continue to shine bright

    Ole Hansen

    Head of Commodity Strategy

  • Macro Outlook: The US rate cut cycle has begun

    Quarterly Outlook

    Macro Outlook: The US rate cut cycle has begun

    Peter Garnry

    Chief Investment Strategist

    The Fed started the US rate cut cycle in Q3 and in this macro outlook we will explore how the rate c...
  • FX Outlook: USD in limbo amid political and policy jitters

    Quarterly Outlook

    FX Outlook: USD in limbo amid political and policy jitters

    Charu Chanana

    Chief Investment Strategist

    As we enter the final quarter of 2024, currency markets are set for heightened turbulence due to US ...

Content disclaimer

None of the information provided on this website constitutes an offer, solicitation, or endorsement to buy or sell any financial instrument, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Saxo Bank A/S and its entities within the Saxo Bank Group provide execution-only services, with all trades and investments based on self-directed decisions. Analysis, research, and educational content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered advice nor a recommendation.

Saxo’s content may reflect the personal views of the author, which are subject to change without notice. Mentions of specific financial products are for illustrative purposes only and may serve to clarify financial literacy topics. Content classified as investment research is marketing material and does not meet legal requirements for independent research.

Before making any investment decisions, you should assess your own financial situation, needs, and objectives, and consider seeking independent professional advice. Saxo does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information provided and assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, losses, or damages resulting from the use of this information.

Please refer to our full disclaimer and notification on non-independent investment research for more details.
- Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
- Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/en-mena/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)


Business Hills Park – Building 4,
4th Floor, office 401, Dubai Hills Estate, P.O. Box 33641, Dubai, UAE

Contact Saxo

Select region

UAE
UAE

All trading and investing comes with risk, including but not limited to the potential to lose your entire invested amount.

Information on our international website (as selected from the globe drop-down) can be accessed worldwide and relates to Saxo Bank A/S as the parent company of the Saxo Bank Group. Any mention of the Saxo Bank Group refers to the overall organisation, including subsidiaries and branches under Saxo Bank A/S. Client agreements are made with the relevant Saxo entity based on your country of residence and are governed by the applicable laws of that entity's jurisdiction.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the US and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.