Leveraged products (e.g., CFDs, Forex (FX) including crypto/fiat, options) are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 61% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. 0.90% of retail clients trading in leveraged products experience a negative account balance after a stop-out occurred. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs, FX, or any of our other products work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Cookie policy
Our websites use cookies to offer you a better browsing experience by enabling, optimising, and analysing site operations, as well as to provide personalised ad content and allow you to connect to social media. By choosing “Accept all” you consent to the use of cookies and the related processing of personal data. Select “Manage consent” to manage your consent preferences. You can change your preferences or retract your consent at any time via the cookie policy page. Please view our cookie policy and our privacy policy.
Leveraged products (e.g., CFDs, Forex (FX) including crypto/fiat, options) are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 61% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider.0.90% of retail clients trading in leveraged products experience a negative account balance after a stop-out occurred.
Leveraged products (e.g., CFDs, Forex (FX) including crypto/fiat, options) are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 61% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. 0.90% of retail clients trading in leveraged products experience a negative account balance after a stop-out occurred. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs, FX, or any of our other products work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
No recession and lower rates will lift the broader market: With a soft landing and lower interest rates, defensive sectors like real estate and utilities are expected to outperform, while opportunities are shifting away from tech-heavy indices towards the broader market. Green transformation stocks, although down this year, may rebound under a low-rate environment in 2025.
What we can learn from past rate cut cycles: Historically, the US equity market performs better after the beginning of a rate cut cycle, with only a few exceptions. Rate cuts should be viewed as a positive opportunity for long-term investors to adjust portfolios for falling rates.
US election outcome and its 2025 impact: A Harris victory with a likely gridlock in Congress could slow fiscal spending but benefit green stocks, emerging markets, and tech. In contrast, a Trump victory might boost European defence stocks while negatively affecting US tech and emerging markets.
No recession and lower rates will lift the broader market
If we look at the global equity market some things have changed in third quarter. There has been a small rotation from cyclical sectors into defensive sectors as some investors took the technology declines in July and volatility hiccup in August as clues that things are about to get worse. The broader US equity market as defined by the equal-weight S&P 500 Index has begun to outperform the S&P 500 Index. This suggests that opportunities may be shifting away from the Magnificent 7 to the broader market. Lower interest rates and a soft landing scenario would point to an everything rally where the rest of the market begins to outperform. The strongest sectors of late have been real estate and utilities as investors are expecting those two sectors to do well with a backdrop of falling interest rates.
If we look across our thematic baskets we still observe the same trends. Defence remains the best theme this year with the New Biotech and Mega Caps rounding out the top three. Everything related to the green transformation is down for the year and is the contrarian bet going into 2025 as lower interest rates could help green stocks, but it is worth noting the risks to green stocks should Trump win the US election. The defence theme is by far together with the green transformation theme the two themes with highest sensitivity to the US election outcome in November.
Our long-term equity views, driven by long-term return expectations, across geography and sectors have not changed much from our previous equity outlook. The US equity market is still the strongest, but the European equity market is just more compelling because it is cheaper. At a sector level, the energy sector has seen expected returns rise during the third quarter as oil prices have fallen and looks very attractive despite its low growth outlook. Sectors such as health care, financials, and communication services also come with a positive outlook. Despite the comeback in utilities and real estate, those two sectors still have the weakest fundamentals and are the only two sectors that are raising capital from shareholders on a net basis.
What we can learn from past Fed rate cut cycles?
The Fed decided at the September FOMC rate decision meeting to cut its policy rate by 50 bps, initiating what is the first rate cut cycle since 2019. The intense debate ahead of the decision was whether the Fed should start its rate cutting cycle cautiously as inflationary pressures are still present and the economy is doing fine, or should front load by cutting quickly to pre-empt the lagged impact on the economy from the high Fed policy rate. While an important discussion, it matters more for investors whether a Fed rate cut cycle is negative or positive for equities?
It is not an exact science to measure and count rate cutting cycles as there are several ways to choose your cycles, ranging from the number of consecutive cuts, the duration of the cycle, the magnitude of cuts etc. We have isolated 20 rate cut cycles by the Fed since 1957 and measured the subsequent 24-month performance in the S&P 500 Index. We find that the US equity market in general (the median path) performs better than the normal historical performance once a Fed rate cut cycle has begun. There are only three paths that end up with a negative return for investors after 24 months. Two of those were the rate cut cycles that begin in November 2000 and July 2007, respectively. These recent examples might lead many to make wrong assumptions on what a rate cut cycle is all about. For the long-term investor, the rate cut cycle should not be viewed as something negative, but rather an opportunity to see whether the portfolio has the right exposures that can do well when interest rates fall.
US election outcome will have a big impact on 2025
The Fed did not manage to slow the economy much in 2023 despite aggressively hiking its policy rate because of the unprecedented fiscal impulse by the Biden administration, one that was unleashed despite the lack of a recession. The fiscal deficit expanded by 4.7% of GDP, equivalent to almost $1trn from July 2022 to July 2023. US politics find itself in a populistic era, regardless of whether Trump or Harris wins. Only gridlock scenarios (in which either winner does not control both houses of Congress) can prevent fiscal stimulus from continuing at unsustainable levels, whereas a Trump sweep or Harris sweep victory would see a continuation of massive fiscal spending.
If Trump wins the election, sweep or gridlock, we expect this outcome to have a large positive effect on European defence companies as a Trump administration would mean less support for Ukraine. In this scenario, the EU would be forced to accelerate defence spending using its own defence industry, a lift to growth expectations for that sector. A Trump administration regardless of whether the Republicans control both houses in the US Congress will mean higher tariffs and potentially weaken sentiment in the US technology sector that depends on long and connected supply chains in Asia. We also expect a more negative sentiment around emerging markets under a Trump administration due to the risks from tariffs and from a stronger US dollar from tariffs.
A Harris victory most likely come with a gridlock scenario where Harris becomes US President but Democrats fail to win the Senate. This scenario could be negative for economic growth in 2025 as fiscal spending will enter a more difficult period. A Harris victory would likely boost stocks linked to the green transformation. We also believe emerging markets and technology stocks could react positively to a Harris administration, in part in a sigh of relief from avoiding new Trump tariffs.
The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.