Saxo Group
Investors often hear about the importance of diversification in building resilient portfolios. However, not all diversification strategies are the same. While some rely on straightforward approaches, others are backed by mathematical models aimed at maximising efficiency. That is essentially the distinction between naive and optimal diversification.
Naive diversification, often considered a 'common-sense' approach, spreads investments evenly across various asset classes or securities without factoring in their relationships or risks.
Optimal diversification uses advanced techniques like mean-variance optimisation to balance returns and risks scientifically. If you don’t know what mean-variance optimisation is, don’t worry, we’ll get to that soon, so keep reading.
Optimal diversification is a strategic method of portfolio allocation that uses mathematical models to balance risk and return. Rooted in Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) by Harry Markowitz, it identifies asset combinations with minimal correlation to create an 'efficient frontier'—a set of portfolios that maximise returns for a given level of risk.
To achieve this balance, optimal diversification employs statistical tools like mean-variance optimisation to identify asset combinations with low or negative correlations. This reduces overall portfolio volatility and improves risk-adjusted returns.
For instance, an optimised portfolio might allocate 50% to stocks, 30% to bonds, and 20% to real estate, not equally but based on historical performance, volatility, and their relationships. This calculation ensures the portfolio remains resilient against market fluctuations while aiming for steady growth.
This strategy relies heavily on accurate data and consistent monitoring. Estimation errors, such as misjudging an asset's future performance or its correlation with others, can compromise the portfolio's efficiency. Despite these challenges, optimal diversification is a preferred method for investors who have access to advanced tools and resources.
Naive diversification is one of the simplest forms of portfolio allocation. This approach involves dividing investments evenly among various assets or asset classes without considering their risk profiles, correlations, or expected returns.
The concept can be traced back to the "1/N strategy," where investors allocate equal portions of their capital to each of N available assets, creating an equally weighted portfolio. While this method avoids complex mathematical calculations, it prioritises simplicity over precision.
For example, an investor practicing naive diversification with a USD 12,000 portfolio might split it equally among stocks, bonds, and commodities, allocating USD 4,000 to each asset class. This approach ensures some level of diversification but does not account for how these assets interact with each other during market shifts.
Naive diversification appeals to investors due to its accessibility and ease of implementation, particularly for those new to portfolio management or without access to advanced tools. However, its reliance on equal weighting means it often overlooks critical factors like asset volatility or economic conditions, which can limit its effectiveness in optimising risk and returns.
Besides limited access to resources and tools, certain behavioural biases influence investors to adopt naive diversification. Below are some key biases that come into play:
Investors influenced by the disposition effect often avoid realising losses by holding onto underperforming investments and, at the same time, sell winning assets prematurely to lock in gains. This bias can lead to naive diversification as investors spread investments equally to mitigate perceived risks, ignoring other factors like volatility or correlation.
Decisions driven by emotions or instinct, known as the affect heuristic, often result in investors choosing assets they associate with positive feelings. This bias simplifies portfolio construction but risks neglecting critical considerations, such as the relationship between assets or their risk profiles.
Investors frequently pick familiar assets, such as domestic stocks or companies they know well, believing these choices to be safer. This tendency reduces the scope of diversification, as unfamiliar but valuable asset classes or securities may be overlooked, limiting potential portfolio benefits.
While both naive and optimal diversification aim to reduce portfolio risk, their approaches differ significantly in execution and effectiveness. Here are their main differences:
Naive diversification is straightforward, dividing investments equally across available options without analysing asset relationships or risks. In contrast, optimal diversification uses advanced tools to tailor allocations based on historical performance, correlations, and volatility.
Naive diversification may provide a basic level of risk reduction but lacks precision. By allocating resources equally, it ignores the potential for some assets to disproportionately increase portfolio risk. On the other hand, optimal diversification strategically combines assets to achieve a higher return for a given risk level, attempting to position portfolios closer to the efficient frontier.
Naive diversification is more prone to "left-tail risk," where extreme negative events significantly impact the portfolio. This occurs because equal allocation does not account for assets with higher volatility or systemic exposure. Optimal diversification mitigates these risks by prioritising low-correlation holdings, smoothing portfolio performance even during market stress.
Naive diversification is more accessible for beginner investors or those with limited resources. It requires no specialised tools or data, making it easy to implement. On the other hand, optimal diversification demands access to reliable data, advanced tools, and a solid understanding of portfolio optimisation techniques.
Investors can benefit from both naive and optimal diversification strategies depending on their goals, resources, and experience.
Naive diversification provides a straightforward option for those starting their investment journey. By splitting investments equally across available options, it offers broad exposure without requiring advanced knowledge or tools. This strategy is beneficial for:
Optimal diversification suits investors who can utilise advanced tools and data-driven strategies. This method is tailored to achieve a precise risk-return balance and aligns well with:
For many investors, a hybrid approach works best. Beginners may start with naive diversification to build confidence and gain exposure across asset classes. Over time, as portfolios grow and expertise increases, transitioning to optimal diversification ensures better alignment with your financial goals while minimising unnecessary risks.
The choice between naive and optimal diversification depends on an investor's experience, goals, and access to resources. While naive diversification offers a simple, beginner-friendly approach to portfolio building, optimal diversification provides a more advanced method for managing risk and achieving higher efficiency.
Investors don't have to choose one approach exclusively. A portfolio that starts with broad exposure through naive diversification can gradually transition into an optimised structure as resources and experience grow. Regardless of the strategy, make sure you monitor and adjust your portfolio accordingly.
Quarterly Outlook
Global Head of Macro Strategy
Quarterly Outlook
Chief Investment Strategist
Quarterly Outlook
Global Head of Investment Strategy
Quarterly Outlook
Head of Commodity Strategy
Quarterly Outlook
Global Head of Macro Strategy
Quarterly Outlook
Chief Investment Strategist
Quarterly Outlook
Chief Investment Strategist
Quarterly Outlook
Head of Commodity Strategy
Quarterly Outlook
Global Head of Macro Strategy
Quarterly Outlook
Head of Fixed Income Strategy